Rs Praveen Kumar: “Education Commission Report Will Go Into Dustbin”
Conspiracies are being made against the education system during the two-year and two-month Revanth regime. Three days ago, Education Commission Chairman Aakunuri Murali gave a report on the education policy to the CM. BRS General Secretary Dr. RS Praveen Kumar gave clarity that if KCR comes to power again, the Education Commission report will be thrown in the dustbin. RS Praveen Kumar, who was set up at Telangana Bhavan, said.. An attempt was made in this report to damage the self-respect of teachers. BRS General Secretary Dr. RS Praveen Kumar alleged that the self-respect of 1.70 lakh teachers has been damaged.
Teachers’ salaries should be determined not by the Education Commission. The PRC should decide… Murali, who has filled his mouth with poison, prepared this report. How can Murali say that the education system has been corrupted during the ten years of KCR’s rule without any review?..Revanth Reddy should apologize to 10,000 teachers. They tried to belittle KCR’s efforts with the Electricity Commission and Kaleshwaram Commissions. Now they have conspired to tarnish KCR’s reputation with the Education Commission report.
KCR has renovated 25,000 schools with the Mana Ooru Manabadi program with a budget of Rs 7,900 crore. There is no need to mention the efforts made during KCR’s tenure regarding Gurukuls. Can’t Aakunuri Murali see that many medical colleges, nursing colleges, sports academies have been started under KCR’s tenure
? Why is Murali criticizing KCR for saying that politics should not be mixed with the education system? He said that KCR is credited with increasing the salaries of teachers and employees through the PRC in a way that has never been done anywhere else in the country.
Revanth Reddy has submitted a report to the Education Commission without increasing the salaries of teachers. Murali has given a report that teachers should be given promotions through tests. Should there be no tests for IAS and IPS promotions? Teachers’ salaries should be respectable if high standards are to be achieved in the education system. This is what many intellectuals have said. Doesn’t Murali know that this is a society of ladders? How can the Commission say that engineering entrance should be abolished and admissions should be given through intermediate marks? Isn’t it the students from rural areas who lose out on engineering seats through intermediate marks? Will this recommendation be beneficial for corporate colleges? The Commission has given a report to abolish fee reimbursement.
