The son lodged a false case against his mother in the court, know what is the matter?
Durg. Dr. Kiranmayi Nayak, Chairperson of the Chhattisgarh State Women’s Commission, held a public hearing on cases related to women’s harassment in the District Panchayat Sabha hall. The 192nd hearing of Durg district was held today under the chairmanship of Chhattisgarh State Women’s Commission Dr. Kiranmayi Nayak. A total of 34 cases were heard in the public hearing organized in Durg district. During the hearing, in one case, the non-applicant government advocate has grabbed his mother’s money, and the advocate has filed a false case against his mother in the court so that he can avoid coming to the commission. The applicant (mother) was advised by the commission to submit an application to the higher authority for cancellation of the license of the non-applicant advocate. So that the license can be canceled while taking action against him.
In another case, the applicant has told that he has got 3 acres of land from his parents in distribution, adjacent to which is the land of non-applicants and the applicant is being prevented from doing farming by non-applicants. Present in the hearing today, the applicant no. 2 said that he has not stopped the applicant from sowing. The commission directed the applicant to start sowing and if there is any obstruction in sowing, then it was asked to make a video and present it. The case was transferred to Raipur for hearing. The applicant was asked to sow in her field within 15 to 20 days, whose information was directed to be presented in the upcoming hearing in Raipur. In another case, both the parties were heard in detail and it was explained that after preparing their respective list of LIC amount, land etc., the next hearing has to be presented in Raipur on August 01, 2023. The younger girl was directed not to deny the non-applicants meeting.
In another case, the present applicant has submitted her application that both the parties have reconciled and divorce has also been done from the court. The applicant wants to withdraw her case. The case was adjourned. Similarly, in another case, due to mutual agreement, the case has been cancelled. In the other case, both the parties were present. There was a dispute between the two parties regarding the transaction of building a house. Both sides say that they do not want to transact with each other. Therefore, the case was disposed of by the Commission.
In another case, the applicant lodged a false complaint against the elderly father-in-law, in which after listening to both the parties, it was found that the case of the applicant and the non-applicant elderly father-in-law was pending in the SDM office, in which the applicant and her family were ordered to vacate the said house. has been ordered. Because of which the commission rejected the said case. In another case, the applicant (police constable) had done second marriage by hiding his first marriage with the applicant, in which a complaint was filed by the applicant in the police department. On which the non-applicant has been separated from the service while taking departmental action. The case was adjourned by the Commission. Another case in which police station police station was ordered yesterday in the hearing dated July 13, 2023, that the non-applicants related to the case were asked to appear in the hearing on today date, in which information has come from the station police station that the non-applicants related to the case Action has not been taken due to non-availability of name and address. Meeta Pawar Additional S.P. present in the hearing of the Commission. It was directed to take legal action by contacting the local people and locating the non-applicants through photographs and submit the report to the Commission after 02 months.
